hitzuu:

Casual kiddos?? / sorry I can’t fashion orz

I’m pretty glad my friend introduced me to this big 4 au

‘cause frIK I adore these characters  and the idea was pretty interesting and I really needed something to pull me out of this art funk I’ve been suffering through

(Source: y0urfuturedicator)

emmyc:

percabeth-stuck-in-tartarus:

animationtidbits:

How to Train Your Dragon 2 - First Look

HES PERFECT

An animated sequel that drastically ages its main characters? UM, YES PLEASE. Design cleverness perfection!!

I heard somewhere that it’d be set five years later, don’t know if that’s still true or not but I sure hope so! Because in the first one, the artbook states somewhere that they’re roughly seventeen. So yes, twenty year old main characters would be AMAAAZZING~~~~

miniyuna:

kelseachan:

jeffgoldbum:

Jack meets Merida

the person who made this is blatantly not scottish

As an actual Scottish person, I concur pffff

This is a nod to Misfits!

Ahhhh! You’re riiigght! It is Misfits dialog!!

(Source: lostiel)

please-ask-hiccup:

I think he would be a wonderful person. As for me… I would be a small dragon.

madithefreckled:

Merida the Viking and now Prince Hiccup. I’ve got ideas in mind for this au but I’m no writer so it likely will never be written into a full-fledged story.

So enjoy some random fanart of them having life-swaps.

zacloudseth:

Croossssooveeerrrrr

(Source: hmakuma)

itsyamtastic:

SHIT!!!!

The film was originally intended to end with Hiccup largely unscathed after the climactic battle. However, the directors decided that it would not feel believable that the heroes could defeat such a formidable foe like the Red Death Dragon without great cost. With that in mind, they decided to have the boy lose part of his left leg at the end of the battle in a deliberate parallel to how Toothless the Dragon lost his left tail fin earlier in the film. Whatever concerns about how parents would react to the hero of a family film being so maimed were settled in the film’s test screenings. Parents in the audience told the producers on their own accord that they approved of that story development and requested that it be kept in the final edit. In addition, the original book’s author, Cressida Cowell, praised this ending and considered it true to the spirit of her book. Furthermore, the scene originally had Hiccup alone as he comes to grips with his wound. However, when Steven Spielberg saw the original footage, he felt that Hiccup and Toothless’ interaction in the film’s final act had been reduced to something like a mere cowboy and his horse. So, he suggested that Toothless be with the boy in that particular scene so as to reinforce the idea that their companionship was far deeper than that.

(Source: filmtrivia)

(Source: foxystuforest)

puffy-ecosystem:

hiccstrid:

This is amazing, what they did. 

They made Hiccup come to a realization that he will never become what his father is pretty much forcing him into. He’s gone through so much emotion in that one scene that he ends up feeling guilty. Because his actions hurt someone else. He did this.

They also made Stoick come to a realization that his force and expectations were too excessive for Hiccup, that his ignorance for what Hiccup has been going through and his own lack of tolerance and care for Hiccup resulted in such a dramatic way. His actions hurt someone else. He did this.

HOW DID I NEVER CATCH THAT. 

And did anyone else notice that both Hiccup and Astrid say ‘So why didn’t you?’

And this movie continues to give me feels. Forever. My favourite animated film.

(Source: hiccstrid-inactive)

The film was originally intended to end with Hiccup largely unscathed after the climactic battle. However, the directors decided that it would not feel believable that the heroes could defeat such a formidable foe like the Red Death Dragon without great cost. With that in mind, they decided to have the boy lose part of his left leg at the end of the battle in a deliberate parallel to how Toothless the Dragon lost his left tail fin earlier in the film. Whatever concerns about how parents would react to the hero of a family film being so maimed were settled in the film’s test screenings. Parents in the audience told the producers on their own accord that they approved of that story development and requested that it be kept in the final edit. In addition, the original book’s author, Cressida Cowell, praised this ending and considered it true to the spirit of her book. Furthermore, the scene originally had Hiccup alone as he comes to grips with his wound. However, when Steven Spielberg saw the original footage, he felt that Hiccup and Toothless’ interaction in the film’s final act had been reduced to something like a mere cowboy and his horse. So, he suggested that Toothless be with the boy in that particular scene so as to reinforce the idea that their companionship was far deeper than that.

(Source: filmtrivia)